Filters
Question type

Oswald, a minor, makes a contract with Albert, an adult, to buy a motorcycle.One week later, Oswald has his eighteenth birthday and shortly thereafter tells Albert he will pick up the motorcycle next week.In this case:


A) Oswald has expressly ratified the contract.
B) the contract must be renegotiated, because Oswald was a minor when it was made.
C) Oswald can change his mind and avoid the contract, because it was made when he was a minor.
D) the contract is void ab initio , because Oswald was a minor at the time it was made.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

While she was 17, Trina purchases a laptop computer.Discuss the implications of her actions as to whether she can disaffirm the contract of purchase if she: (a) tries to sell the computer one year later; (b) continues to use the computer for eighteen months; or (c) has not yet made all of the payments when she turns 18, but continues to make monthly payments.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Ratification may be implied from a perso...

View Answer

In some states, minors are liable for contracts involving bank accounts and student loans and cannot avoid these contracts even though they can avoid other types of contracts.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Natalie, age 17, rented a power washer and while using the machine, she negligently damaged it beyond repair.Under the majority view, the rental company can successfully sue Natalie for damages on a tort theory of negligence since it is well settled that minors are liable for their torts.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A binding promise or agreement requires that the parties to the agreement have contractual capacity.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The contracts of a person who is adjudicated insane and placed in care of a guardian are void.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Contracts of a ward may be ratified by his guardian during the period of guardianship.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Michelle is 17 years old and earns extra money by repairing cars.Nathan, who is 21, brings his car to Michelle for repairs, and Michelle ruins the brake system of the car because of her inexperience.If Nathan sues Michelle for negligence in performing the auto repair contract, in most states Michelle will have no liability, because the tort of negligence and the auto repair contract are connected.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The case of In re The Score Board, Inc.involved the issue of:


A) a minor's liability for misrepresentation of age.
B) whether an incompetent person's contracts are void or voidable.
C) ratification of a contract upon attaining majority.
D) liability for necessaries.

E) None of the above
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a contract to sell necessaries to a minor, these goods and services are limited to medical care, food, and shelter.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Carlie contracted to purchase an entertainment center while she was 16.She can ratify the contract the following year.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The doctrine of necessaries applies in the same way to minors and mental incompetents.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

At age 17, Wanda purchased an expensive sound system from Lectronic City.If Wanda wishes to ratify this contract, Wanda:


A) must reach the age of majority and ratify the contract as a whole.
B) may do so by express notification at any time before reaching the age of majority.
C) may at any time keep the sound system but avoid any remaining debt owed on it.
D) may do so at any time by express or implied action before or after reaching the age of majority.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the doctrine of liability for a tort connected with a contract?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Minors are generally liable for their to...

View Answer

Emancipated minors have no ability to avoid contracts based upon their minority.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is untrue regarding the contracts of intoxicated persons?


A) If an intoxicated person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his act, then the contract is voidable.
B) The effect of intoxication is generally the same as that given to contracts that are voidable because of incompetency.
C) Slight intoxication will destroy one's contractual capacity.
D) To make a contract voidable, a person need not be so drunk that he is totally without reason or understanding.

E) None of the above
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Compare the liability of an intoxicated person to that of a person who is mentally ill.How are their situations similar? How are they different with regard to contractual capacity?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a person is mentally incompetent, he ...

View Answer

Ratification of a contract, once effected, is final and cannot be withdrawn.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Discuss the effect of a court's declaring someone incompetent and appointing a guardian.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The effect of a court's declaring a pers...

View Answer

Disaffirmance must be express; it may not be implied.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 74

Related Exams

Show Answer